High CourtsSingle Bench

In Re: the Goods of Sir John Wemyss

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 20 February 1879 · Citation: (1879) ILR (Cal) 725 : (1879) ILR (Cal) 721

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pontifex, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 129 words

Pontifex, J.—None of these authorities go to the extent of showing that where a will has been made, memoranda in a book can be treated as a codicil.

2.

All the memoranda in the book appear to have been made after the date of the will. One memorandum is dated the 11th January 1878, and says: "My will is in an iron safe in my house, whereby I have given to my brother David," &c. All the other memoranda are in January 1877. The memorandum dated the 11th January 1878 sets up the will entirely.

3.

On this ground also that I do not think the memoranda are testamentary, I must refuse probate of them.

4.

Application refused. Administrator-General''s costs of application to be paid out of the estate.