AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
44 paragraphs · 774 wordsThe instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dt. 3rd June, 2020, passed by Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I.
Act) Cases-17, Jaipur Metropolitan, whereby permission to the petitioner to go abroad, has been declined in a Criminal case No.509/2018 registered
under Section 498-A & 406 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was granted bail with a condition that the petitioner would not leave the country without
permission of the Court and as such the petitioner had to move an application for seeking permission to go to Australia for a period of six months. Vide
order dt. 22nd August, 2019, the revision petition filed by the petitioner was allowed, canceling the order dt. 16 th July, 2019, passed by the Trial Court
and permission was granted to the petitioner to go abroad and operative portion of the order is quoted hereunder:-
""
16.07. 2019
- 1-
15 1,00,000/- 30.11.2019
2-
3-
, -
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner after getting permission of the Court, had gone abroad and he also came back before
the stipulated time which was prescribed by the Revisional Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner again is required to
go back to Australia and he is working there and as such he sought permission to go to Australia and the same permission has been declined to him by
the Trial Court on the ground that COVID-19 is prevailing in the Country and abroad and as such there is no justification to grant permission to the
petitioner to go abroad.
Learned counsel submitted that the reasons assigned while rejecting the application is also with regard to flight schedule which are not operating to
take the persons outside the country and as such considering the lock-down period and non-operation of flights, the application of the petitioner has
been dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to Phrase-II & IV Vande Bharat Mission, where the persons who are required to go abroad, can avail
the facility as has been initiated by Air India for taking the passengers outside the country. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
employer of the petitioner has also informed the petitioner to come back as situation in the Australia is now normal and as such counsel refers to letter
of his employer, which is filed as Annex.6 in the Miscellaneous Petition.
Learned counsel further submitted that in case the petitioner would not be permitted to go abroad, he might lose his job and other complications may
also arise. Learned counsel submitted that when initially permission was declined, he had approached the Revisional Court, however, considering the
extra-ordinary situation, the petitioner does not have any choice except to file the present misc. petition for seeking a direction.
Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the Court below has not committed any illegality in refusing the permission to the petitioner as charges
against the petitioner are framed under Section 498-A & 406 IPC and the petitioner is required to participate in the criminal case as he has already
availed the benefit of bail.
I have heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
This Court finds that the petitioner was extended benefit of going abroad earlier and the condition which was imposed of returning back to India was
complied with by him and as such the petitioner cannot be presumed to have any intention to avoid the Trial which he is facing. This Court further
finds that the flight schedule which is produced for perusal of this Court also permits flights going abroad from Delhi and as such flights are operating
between Delhi and Sydney and the petitioner if has valid visa and valid documents, can avail the facility of going abroad for the purpose of his job.
This Court also finds that the Government of Australia has also found that the situation after COVID-19 is normal and under control and people from
other country can fly in Australia.
This Court accordingly, allows the present misc. petition and permission is granted to the petitioner to go to Australia for a period of six months.
However, the petitioner would be required to execute the Bank Guarantee of Rs.2,00,000/- and the same is required to be filed before the Trial Court
that the petitioner would come back within a period of six months and he will give his presence in the Trial Court. The petitioner is also directed to
show the relevant tickets of going to Australia to the Trial Court.
Accordingly, the present misc. petition stands disposed of.
