High CourtsSingle Bench

Inder Raj vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 7 January 2019 · Citation: (2019) 01 P&H CK 0285

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 40311 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 233 words

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J

Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming the re-fixation of his pay in view of the orders of this Court passed in CWP No.16084 of 1997, CWP No.2757 of 1998 and CWP No.4518 of 2000 which were upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 08.12.2015 (Annexure P-5).

Petitioner claim that he is similarly situated with those who have been granted the relief by this Court but the same has not been granted to him only on the ground that he has not approached this Court and was not the petitioner in above mentioned writ petitions. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case, a time bound direction is given to the respondents to decide the representation dated 05.08.2018 (Annexure P-7).

Keeping in view the request made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and entitlement of the petitioner in respect of the claim made in the writ petition/representation, the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 05.08.2018 (Annexure P-7) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any relief, the same shall also be released to him within a period of next three months.

Present writ petition stands disposed of.