High CourtsDivision Bench(1919) 02 CAL CK 0055

Indian Stamp Act and A.M. Amolia vs Ibrahim Ishak

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 4 February 1919 · Citation: 51 Ind. Cas. 221

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lancelot Sanderson, C.J · John Woodroffe, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 109 words

Sanderson, C.J.—In this case learned Counsel has conceded, and I think rightly, that the tenancy was a monthly tenancy; and, consequently, it comes within Article 35, Clause (a), Sub-clause (i) of the First Schedule of the Indian Stamp Act, that is to say, "the lease purports to be for a term of less than one year." Therefore, the proper stamp duty is the same duty as for a bond which is referred to in Article 15 and inasmuch as the amount is above Rs. 50 and does not exceed Rs. 100, the proper stamp duty is eight annas, as the learned Judge has decided.

Woodroffe, J.

2.

I agree.