High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 09 BOM CK 0008

Indoworth (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex., Nagpur

Bombay High Court · Decided on 3 September 2011 · Citation: (2012) 27 STR 3

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.F. Dharmadhikari, J · A.P. Bhangale, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Central Excise Appeal No. 22 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 124 words
1.

Heard Shri S.G. Shukla, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri S.K. Mishra, learned A.S.G.I. for respondent. Perused the impugned order dated 24-12-2010 passed by the 2011 (22) S.T.R. 197 . It is apparent that Service Tax though not applicable has been paid belatedly, and that belated payment has been used towards CENVAT Credit. The payment made, therefore, must be treated as voluntary payment of service tax. If that amount is to be voluntarily permitted to be utilized towards CENVAT Credit, it is apparent that for late payment of service tax, interest amount needed to be paid.

2.

The Tribunal has properly considered all aspects. We do not find any substantial question of law arise for consideration. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.