High CourtsSingle Bench

Indrajeet Leyangi @ Amar vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 11 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 JH CK 0119

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 413, 414 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(ii)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 11713 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 362 words

Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after the

lockdown is over.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the

present.

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chaibasa Muffasil P.S. case no. 114 of 2018 (NDPS case no. 04 of 2018) registered under

Sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 20 (ii) of NDPS Act, 1985.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected on 08.05.2019 in B.A. No. 543 of 2019

with the condition that the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail, after framing of charge. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

that the co-accused persons, whose case stands on worse footing than the petitioner, has been admitted on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court

vide order dated 03.06.2020 passed in BA no. 1775 of 2020. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no narcotic drug or

psychotropic substance has been seized from the possession of the petitioner and only two motorcycles have been recovered from the possession of

the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 01.09.2018 as mentioned

in paragraph 15 of the bail application and the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be

released on bail.

Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

Sessions Judge-I, Chaibasa in connection with Chaibasa Muffasil P.S. case no. 114 of 2018 (NDPS case no. 04 of 2018) subject to the condition that

the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case.