Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Indusind Media & Communications Ltd vs Atul Suresh Sahay

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 14 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 TDSAT CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition Nos. 279, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332 Of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 129 words

Even after revised list, none is present for respondent no. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present.

As this matter is of old year i.e. 2015 and has been listed after a long gap of time, in utter precaution and in the interest of justice, Office of this Tribunal is directed to issue notice to counsel / non-appearing respondent(s) through email/speed post/fax indicating next date of hearing and for enabling the presence of respondent(s).

Learned counsels are also requested to communicate and intimate the other side about fixing of date and order passed above.

Accordingly, let the matter be listed ‘for directions’ on 28.11.2022.

In the meantime, written arguments may be filed in the records of the Tribunal and exchanged in between the parties.