High CourtsSingle Bench

Islam And Others vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 UK CK 0145

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttarakahnd Protection Of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 — Section 3, 5, 11
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 770 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 154 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicants Islam, Mizan and Shahnawaz are in judicial custody in Case Crime No.35 of 2024, under Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakahnd Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station- Bhugawala, District-Haridwar. They have sought their release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that nothing was recovered from them; they have no criminal history.

4.

Learned State Counsel would submit that the applicants were arrested from the spot.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.