High CourtsSingle Bench

Ismail vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 23 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 KL CK 0264

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 377 · Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 77, 78 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3(a), 3(d), 4, 5(l), 6, 11(ii), 12
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 4487 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 439 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1.

This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.196 of 2022 of Parappanangadi Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as Sections 77, 78 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015; and also under Section 4 r/w sections 3(a), 3(d), Section 6 r/w Section 5(l), Section 12 r/w Section 11(ii) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3.

The prosecution case is that, between May 2019 and March 2022, the accused kidnapped the victim, who is a minor boy aged only 16 years; and committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on him against the order of nature and also compelled him to use liquor and even sell narcotic drugs.

4.

Sri.K.P.Sudheer, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that petitioner is totally innocent and that the offences alleged against him are false. It was also pointed out that the petitioner was arrested on 10.04.2022 and that he has been in custody since then.

5.

Smt.Nima Jacob, the learned Public Prosecutor, vehemently opposed the grant of regular bail and submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are grave in nature.

6.

A perusal of the case diary reveals that prima facie there are materials on record to connect the petitioner with the crime. However, since petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 10.04.2022, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required in the circumstances of the case. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

7.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(I) Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- [Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

(iii) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the victim or his family members;

(iv) Petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail.

(v) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.