High Courts

Iswar Chandra Koer vs Umesh Chandra Pal

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 30 September 1871 · Citation: (1871) 09 CAL CK 0002

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 156 words

Kemp, Offg. C.J.

1.

I have on three occasions, in Queen v. Mohim Chandra Chuckerbutty 3 B.L.R., A. Cr., 67, Dulali Bewa v. Bhuban Shaha 3 B.L.R., A. Cr., 53 and The Queen v. Girish Chandra Ghose 7 B.L.R., 513, sitting with Justices Glover and Markby, ruled that a Magistrate is not competent to make over a case to a Subordinate Deputy Magistrate who has not been empowered to entertain cases either on complaint or on the report of the Police, without first recording the prosecutor''s statement. I would quash the conviction as illegal. The accused must be released.

Ainslie, J.

It seems to me that, u/s 66B of the Criminal Procedure Code, a Magistrate who is competent to direct that all complaints or reports of Police officers may be dealt with by a Subordinate Magistrate, is also competent to direct any particular complaint or report to be so dealt with. I would therefore not interfere.