High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 09 KAR CK 0045

Jagadish Bajaj vs Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 8 September 2011 · Citation: (2012) 281 ELT 71

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi Malimath, J · N. Kumar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.S.T.A. No''s. 12-13 of 2008

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 170 words

N. Kumar, J.—Both these appeals are preferred by the assessees challenging the order passed by the Tribunal 2008 (129) ECC 211 which has held that the assessees are not entitled to the benefit of exemption under Indo-Sri Lankan Free Trade Agreement (ISFTA) and therefore, they are liable to pay duty and also liable for payment of anti-dumping duty and also C.V. duty. Therefore, the question that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether there is liability of the assessee to pay duty? In other words, the question that arises for consideration before this Court is regarding determination of the rate of duty payable. The said question has to be adjudicated buy the Apex Court under Sec. 130(c) of the Customs Act, 1962 as it does not fall within the purview of Sec. 129 of the Act as held by this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Motorola India Limited, Accordingly, both the appeals are rejected reserving liberty to the assessees to approach the Apex Court.