High CourtsSingle Bench

Jagarnath Rai vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 9 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 PAT CK 0126

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 272, 273 · Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 — Section 30(a), 41(1)(2), 76(2) · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31717 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 515 words
1.

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2.

Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel along with Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal,

learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

3.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Motipur PS Case No. 68 of 2020 dated 21.03.2020, instituted under Sections 272/273 of the

Indian Penal Code and 30(a)/41(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

4.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he was assisting Gopal Choudhary from whose house there was recovery of 1295.660 litres of liquor and

that on seeing police raiding party he along with others had run away.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is nothing to connect the petitioner to the recovery as neither it is in his house nor the mobile

which was seized by the police in the house of Gopal Choudhary belongs to him and that he has no connection with Gopal Choudhary as he is resident

of another village. It was further submitted that only on the basis of suspicion, without any material to link the petitioner to the recovery, he has been

made accused and, thus, the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act would not apply in the facts of the present case. Learned counsel submitted that the

petitioner is accused in one other case which is under minor sections of the Indian Penal Code for an incident relating to a dharna being organized.

6.

Learned APP submitted that the petitioner is accused of assisting Gopal Choudhary from whose house recovery has been made.

7.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise, Muzaffarpur in Motipur PS Case No. 68

of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further (i) that one of the bailors shall be a

close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the

petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory

provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to

cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate

or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

8.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.