High CourtsSingle Bench

Jagbir Singh vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 1 RCR(Criminal) 609

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 323, 325 · Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 — Section 4(1)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CRR No. 3162 of 2010 (O and M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 319 words

Alok Singh, J.—This revision petition is filed by the revisionist - Petitioner against the judgment dated 11.11.2010 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sonepat, as well as judgment dated 2.1.2008 passed by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Sonepat, whereby Petitioner is convicted under Sections 325/323/148 IPC and was awarded sentence of one year u/s 325 IPC and fine of Rs. 2000/-, six months u/s 323 IPC and fine of Rs. 500/-and six months u/s 148 IPC and fine of Rs. 500/-

2.

At the outset, learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not challenge the conviction of the Petitioner. He further states that since sentence awarded is one year, hence, Petitioner is liable to be released on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, while maintaining the conviction of the Petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that Petitioner be released on probation u/s 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, for a period of five months on furnishing his personal bond and undertaking with one surety to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court that he will keep peace and be of good behaviour. In case he is found to be indulged in such like illegal activities, sentence awarded by the Court below shall stand revived automatically. However, fine imposed upon the Petitioner is enhanced to Rs. 20,000/-. The Petitioner is directed to deposit the above said amount, within one month from today, with the Trial Court. On deposit so being made, the Trial Court shall issue notice to the victim and disburse the amount to him forthwith. It is made clear that in case enhanced amount is not deposited, as directed above, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed and the order of the Courts below shall stand revived automatically.

3.

With above mentioned modification, this revision petition stands disposed of.