High CourtsSingle Bench

Jagdish Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 18 August 2020 · Citation: (2020) 08 SHI CK 0153

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Execution Petition No.85 of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 118 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

Notice. Mr. Dinesh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3Â​State, whereas Mr. Tara

Singh Chauhan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4.

At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition, however, with liberty to agitate his cause before

the appropriate Forum.

2.

Learned Counsel for respondent No.4 informs the Court that the enquiry has already been taken to its logical conclusion. His statement is taken on

record.

3.

Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand dismissed. Interim order, if

any, also stand vacated.

Copy dasti.