AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 269 wordsApprehending their arrest the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with C.P. Case No.705 of 2016 registered under Sections 304B/201/120B/109/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law (Bhaisur) and petitioner no.3 is sister-in-law (Gotni) of the deceased (Arti Devi). This case has falsely been instituted on the basis of a complaint petition.
Let notice be issued to opposite party no.2. The petitioners are directed to file requisites of notice through both process i.e. under registered post with A/D as well as through ordinary process within a period of one week, failing which, this anticipatory bail application shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
List this case on 21.07.2017.
Considering the submissions of counsels and the fact as discussed, I am inclined to pass an interim order of anticipatory bail to the petitioners provisionally till 21.07.2017. In case of the petitioners being arrested by the police on or before 21.07.2017, they shall be released on bail provisionally on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the officer concerned in connection with C.P. Case No.705 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
