High CourtsSingle Bench

Jagir Singh @ Kali and another vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 P&H CK 0223

HON’BLE JUDGES
Inderjit Singh , J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 324, 326, 438(2), 452
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous ( M) No.35892 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 322 words

Petitioners-Jagir Singh @ Kali and Nishan Singh have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity,

'Cr.P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail in case DDR No.21 dated 02.07.2018, under Sections 323, 324, 452 and 34 IPC (Section 326 IPC added later

on), registered at Police Station Sri Hargobindpur, in FIR No.72 dated 01.07.2018, under Sections 326 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sri

Hargobindpur, Police District Batala.

Notice of motion was issued in this case. Learned State counsel put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and gone through the record.

From the record, I find that both the petitioners are named in the DDR. Petitioner-Jagir Singh @ Kali is stated to be empty handed and no injury is

attributed to him, whereas, petitioner-Nishan Singh is stated to have given dang blow on the right hand of the complainant.

In pursuance of the interim order dated 21.08.2018 passed by this Court, the petitioners have already joined the investigation. They are not required for

custodial interrogation. Therefore, no useful purpose will be served by sending them to custody.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts of the case in minute details; without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the case and in view of the facts that it is a case of version and cross-version and it is yet to be determined by the trial Court

on the basis of evidence as to who is the aggressor party, I find merit in this petition and the same is allowed. The order dated 21.08.2018, granting

interim bail to the petitioners, is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by

the conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.