High CourtsSingle Bench

Jagpal vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 14 September 2011 · Citation: (2011) 09 UK CK 0167

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 161 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 364(A), 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 747 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 177 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Applicant - Jagpal, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 18/57 of 2011, relating to offences punishable u/s 364A, 506 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Pathri, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that from the statement of Satyapal and Jaswant (who are said to have been abducted), recorded u/s 161 Code of Criminal Procedure, it is clear that the applicant Jagpal has not committed any crime. Rather, applicant Jagpal and one Mukesh were separated by four - five unknown persons who after beating them took Satyapal and Jaswant, and kept them captive.

4.

In the above circumstances, Having gone through the statements of the victims recorded u/s 161 Code of Criminal Procedure, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail.

5.

The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Jagpal be released on bail on executing personal bond, and furnishing two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar.