AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 327 wordsThe petitioners pray for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 61 dated 13.03.2016, registered under Sections 420 and 120-B of the IPC at Police
Station Sadar Ferozepur, District Ferozepur.
The operative part of the order dated 23.04.2018, vide which petitioners have been granted interim bail, is reproduced below:
“Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the allegation in the FIR, the complainant on 16.04.2007 executed a general power of
attorney in favour of Satish Kumar, father of petitioner No.2. It is further alleged that later on, the said GPA was cancelled on 24.02.2009 and despite
that Satish Kumar has sold the property in favour of petitioner No.1 â€" Jagsir Singh and petitioner No.2 was also present there. It is further submitted
that after registration of the FIR, an enquiry was entrusted to the Assistant Inspector General of Police, (Crime) Patiala Zone, Patiala who had given a
report dated 28.07.2015 recommending cancellation of the FIR by giving a finding that there is no document produced by the complainant to show that
he had cancelled the GPA or had given information to Sation Kumar. Counsel for the petitioners has further argued that petitioner No.1 is a bona fide
purchaser and no specific role is attributed to petitioner No.2 except that he was present at the office of Tehsildar at the time of execution of the sale
deed. Notice of motion for 12.07.2018 â€
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners, in pursuance to the order dated 23.04.2018, have already appeared before the
SHO/Investigating Officer and have joined the investigation.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Gurdev Singh, has not disputed the factual position and submits that petitioners have joined the
investigation and are no more required for any further investigation.
In view of the above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to petitioners, vide order dated 23.04.2018, is made absolute subject to the
conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
