High CourtsSingle Bench

Jagu Adakatia vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 16 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 OHC CK 0206

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(c), 37
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1893 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 295 words

G. Satapathy, J

1.

This matter  is  taken up  through  Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

This is a bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Pottangi P.S. Case No.78 of 2023 arising out of T.R. Case No.76 of 2023 pending in the file of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Koraput, for commission of offence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act, on the allegation of transporting 504Kgs and 150Grams of Contraband Ganja in an Eicher vehicle bearing Registration No. MH-19CY-7780 and one Tata 407 pick up Van bearing Registration No. AP31TD-9907 along with co-accused persons.

3.

Heard Mr.Jagannath Gochhayat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.N.Nayak, learned ASC in the matter and perused the record.

4.

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offences as alleged against the petitioner, so also the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the fact that the petitioner was allegedly caught red-handed while transporting 504KGs & 150Grams of Contraband Ganja in an Eicher vehicle bearing Registration No. MH-19CY-7780 and one Tata 407 pick up Van bearing Registration No. AP31TD-9907 along with co-accused persons and the Contraband Ganja seized in this case being coming under commercial quantity and, therefore, normally the provisions of Sec. 37 of NDPS Act would be attracted. In the aforesaid situation, this Court, however, on perusal of materials on record is unable to record satisfaction of Sec. 37 of NDPS Act to grant bail to the present petitioner.

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant and seizure witnesses.

5.Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of..

.……………………………