AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 341 wordsJaishree Thakur, J
The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.41 dated 16.02.2020, under
Section 22 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Bathinda, District Bathinda.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia would contend that the petitioner herein was taken into custody in the aforesaid FIR on 16.02.2020 and the
trial is not proceeding. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He would rely upon a resolution passed by the
Gram Panchayat, which would reflect that the petitioner, in fact, had been apprehended from within his house instead of from a car, as reflected in the
FIR. Counsel would also argue that a recovery of 20 bottles of Wincirex (100 ml each) has been shown from the petitioner. He would also rely upon
orders passed by the Coordinate Benches of this court wherein, in similar circumstances, bail has been allowed.
Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, opposes the grant of regular bail to
the petitioner, while submitting that the contraband recovered from the petitioner falls under the commercial quantity.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the facts that the petitioner herein has been in custody since 16.02.2020; investigation is complete as the challan has already been presented
and because of Covid-19 pandemic, the courts are not functioning at their full strength, as such, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the
petitioner behind bars. At this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be
released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
However, anything observed or said by this court is only for the purpose of deciding the instant petition for grant of regular bail and the same shall
have no affect on the merits of the case.
