High CourtsDivision Bench

Jai Krishan and Others vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 15 November 2010 · Citation: (2010) 11 SHI CK 0368

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · V.K. Ahuja, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 7011 of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 157 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J. 1. The Petitioners claim work charge status from the date they completed 10 years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P. and Others,

2.

The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority.The Petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second Respondent within a period of one month from today. The second Respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The Petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of this judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s).

3.

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.