High CourtsDivision Bench

Jai Naina Devi Stone Crusher vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 21 June 2010 · Citation: (2010) 06 SHI CK 0014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Kuldip Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 2261 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 234 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The Writ Petition is filed with following prayers:

(a) That the withdrawal order dated 29-4-2010 (Annexure P-5) withdrawing the Registration Certificate of the Petitioner''s Stone Crusher may kindly be declared illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires and same may kindly be directed to be quashed and set aside qua the Petitioner.

(b) That the Respondent may kindly be directed to grant the mining lease to the Petitioner for the area which has been applied and recommended by the Joint Inspection Committee.

2.

It is not in dispute that the application of the Petitioner is being duly processed. According to the Petitioner, he has complied with all the required formalities for the purpose of the lease. It is the submission of the Petitioner that he is suffering huge loss everyday in view of the infrastructure already provided at the site and the investment made therein.

3.

Since, it is submitted that the application is under process, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to take a decision on the application filed by the Petitioner within two weeks on production of the copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the Writ Petition by the Petitioner. It is made clear that in case the mining lease is granted, the electricity connection will be restored forthwith.

4.

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.