High CourtsSingle Bench

Jai Singh Bheel vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 18 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 MP CK 0133

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sheel Nagu, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 332, 336, 353, 395
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 52391 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 604 words

The petitioner has filed this first application u/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

The petitioner has been arrested on 11.11.2019 by Police Station Chanchauda, District Guna (M.P.) in connection with Crime No.447/2006 registered

in relation to the offence punishable u/Ss.147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 395, 332, 353, 336 IPC.

Learned Panel Lawyer for the State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegations and the

material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.

Petitioner is in custody since 11.11.2019 where investigation in the matter is over by filing charge-sheet on 16.11.2019. Allegation against the petitioner

is omnibus in nature where the petitioner was a part of mob comprising a large number of persons which formed unlawful assembly and attacked on

police personnel in which SHO died.

Considering the above facts and in view of the omnibus allegations and no specific allegation on the petitioner of causing either any particular injury or

fatal injury and that early conclusion of the trial is bleak possibility and prolonged pre-trial detention is anathema to the concept of liberty and the

material placed on record does not disclose possibility of the petitioner fleeing from justice, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the

petitioner but with certain stringent conditions looking to the nature of offence.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail on

furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties each of Rs. 25,000/-to the satisfaction of the

concerned Trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the petitioner :-

1.

The petitioner will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The petitioner will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The petitioner will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

5.

The petitioner will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6.

The petitioner will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

7.

The petitioner shall render community service at the hospital/Community Health Centre/Primary Health Centre situated at or in the vicinity of

village/Tahsil of residence of petitioner for three (3) hours everyday including Sunday till the conclusion of trial.

The nature of community service shall be decided and allotted in writing by the CMO/Head of the hospital/Community Health Centre/Primary Health

Centre situated in close vicinity to the place of residence of petitioner. Compliance of this condition shall be ensured and verified by issuing certificate

to be jointly signed by head of hospital/Community Health Centre/Primary Health Centre and Sarpanch/Councilor of the Gram Panchayat/Municipality

concerned. This certificate shall be filed before the Registry of this Court once in every month. If the Registry finds that either the compliance report

is not filed once in a month or there is something amiss in the compliance report filed then the case be listed as PUD before appropriate Bench.

Copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned and as well as Chief Medical Officer of concerned District for compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.