High CourtsSingle Bench

Jaikey Rajak vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 7 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 CHH CK 0123

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366, 376(2)(ढ), 376(घ्) · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offence Act, 2012 — Section 5ठ, 6, 6छ
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 6587 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 463 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

The present is a repeat application filed under Section 439 of CrPC seeking for grant of bail to the Applicant who is in jail since 17.8.2017 in

connection with Crime No. 156/2017 registered at Police Station- Sitapur, District Surguja, for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)

( ), 376( ) of IPC and Section 5 /6, 6 /6 of the POCSO Act.

2.

The earlier bail application stood dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same after the prosecutrix is examined, vide order dated 7.4.2018

passed in M.Cr.C. No. 560/2018.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that subsequent to the dismissal of the earlier bail application, the Prosecutrix has been examined before

the Court below on 18.7.2018 and during the course of evidence she has turned hostile and has not fully supported the case of the prosecution and

thus the Applicant deserves to be released on bail. The Counsel further submits that the co-accused Mubarak Khan against whom also similar

allegations have been levelled, has been granted bail by this Court on 3.8.2018 in M.Cr.C. No. 5596/2018 and on this ground also the Applicant prays

for grant of bail on parity basis.

4.

Learned Counsel for the State however opposing the bail application submits that though the Prosecutrix has turned hostile but in her cross-

examination she has taken a stand of the Applicant to have been involved in the act and having committed the offence against the Prosecutrix and

therefore the Applicant does not deserve to get bail.

5.

Having heard the contentions put forth on either side and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly taking note of the

fact that the co-accused Mubarak Khan has already been granted bail by this Court under similar charges and the grant of bail to the said Mubarak

Khan was also on the ground that the Prosecutrix has not supported the case of the prosecution and has turned hostile, in the instant case also, so far

as the Applicant is concerned in her cross- examination in paragraph 7 of her deposition the Prosecutrix has categorically stated of the Applicant did

not commit any act with her.

6.

Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the deposition of the Prosecutrix, this Court is of the opinion that prima facie a strong

case is made out for grant of bail to the Applicant.

7.

Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is ordered that the Applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for

a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed by the

Trial Court.