AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
P. Sam Koshy, J
Ignoring the default as pointed out by the Registry, with the consent parties, the writ petition disposed of finally.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for grant regular pay scale
on their completing three years of service as daily wage employee.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that all these petitioners have since retired from service. They were all initially appointed prior to 1990 as daily
wage employee and in due course of time, they were regularized in the year 2008 and have since retired.
The Grievance of the petitioners is that under the rules, the daily wage employees who have completed three years of service should receive the
regular pay scale under the work charge contingency establishment which has not been given to any of the petitioners in the present writ petition.
A perusal of record would show that the petitioners till now have not made any representation while they were in service in respect of their claim
and have now at this belated stage approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Thus, at this juncture this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Reserving the right of the petitioners to make a suitable representation to
respondent No 3 who in turn shall consider and scrutinize the claim of the petitioners, the writ petition stands disposed of. If the petitioners 3are found
entitled for the benefit, the same be extended to them and if they are not entitled for the benefit, they be suitably intimated as to why they would not be
entitled for the said benefit .
With the aforesaid observations the writ petition stands disposed off.
