High CourtsSingle Bench

Jaipal vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 13 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 SHI CK 0044

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 382 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 219 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

Since petitioner, who is working as clerk in the department of Animal and Husbandry, has already completed his normal tenure of posting in the

office of Deputy Director, Animal Health/breeding Lahaul and Spiti Keylong and despite his several requests, he is not being transferred to a soft

area, he has approached this court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying therein to issue direction to

the respondents to consider his pending representation (Annexure P-4), in a time bound manner.

2.

Mr. Narender Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, while waiving notice on behalf of the respondents fairly states that representation, if any,

filed by the petitioner, shall be decided, in a time bound manner by the department concerned.

3.

Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation

(Annexure P-4), expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of

instant order shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to

approach the appropriate/competent court of law in the appropriate proceedings, if he still remains aggrieved. All pending applications stand disposed

of.

Copy dasti.