High CourtsDivision Bench

Jakir Hossain Sheik vs State

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 August 2020 · Citation: (2020) 08 CAL CK 0005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bibek Chaudhuri, J · Soumen Sen, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 307 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Case (Bail Application) (CRM) No. 5335 Of 2020, Criminal Application No. 3649 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 207 words

The petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The

petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

The petitioner is the husband of the de facto complainant. We have perused the case diary and we do not find any prima facie material of offence

under Section 307 IPC. Therefore, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only),

with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner shall meet the I.O. once in a fortnight. In case of the breach of any of the conditions, the

anticipatory bail shall automatically cancelled without any further reference to Court.

It is made clear that during the period of anticipatory bail the petitioner will not keep any connection with the de facto complainant for the purpose of

her security.

CRM 5335 of 2020 and CRAN 3649 of 2020 are disposed of.