High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 12 OHC CK 0052

Jaladhar @ Jalandhar Swain vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 12 December 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Savitri Ratho, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 13043 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 546 words

Savitri Ratho, J

1.

This application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed in connection with Balianta P.S. Case No. 375 of 2023 corresponding to T.R. Case No. 560 of 2023 pending in the court of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

2.

The prayer for bail  of the petitioner has been rejected by  a common order dated 08.11.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar in T.R. No.  560 of 2023  in respect of the petitioner and co-accused Kabuli  @ Prasanna Routray and Gudu  @ Ananta Bala.

3.

The prosecution allegations in brief against the petitioner are that on  03.11.2023  afternoon,  while  the  informant  and  his  team  were performing patrolling duty at Balianta Bazar, they received credible information  regarding  transportation  of ganja  in  a  passenger  auto bearing  Registration  No.  OD-02D-3668  from  Nuagaon  side,  being escorted by  an Apache motor cycle bearing  Registration No.  OD-02BM-0726.   The informant and his team proceeded to the spot and detained the auto rickshaw as well as the motorcycle and during search, 9.630 kgs. of contraband ganja was seized from the auto rickshaw.  As the petitioner and co-accused persons could not produce any authority for possession of the said ganja, the ganja was seized and they were arrested.

4.

Mr. P.K. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2023 and he does not have any  criminal  antecedents.  He  further  submits  that  in  view  of the quantity of ganj# szritgleSection 37 of the NDPS Act will not be a bar for considering his prayer foricai1rtL'c

5.

Mr.  SIS.  Pradhan,  learned  Additional  Government Advocate opposes the prayer for bail stating that investigation tig at a nascent stage and accused may not co-operate with the investigation or trial if  he is released on bail.  He further submits that these types of crimes are rising  everyday and  as  investigation  is  in  progress,  the  criminal antecedents of the petitioner are to be verified.

6.

Considering the quantity of ganja seized and the submission that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents, I am inclined to allow the prayer for bail.

7.

The petitioner- Jaladhar @ Jalandhar Swain shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as may be fixed by the learned Court below  in  seisin  over the matter,  after verification  of his  criminal antecedents, including the following conditions:

(i) He will not indulge in any criminal activity while on bail.

(ii) He   will   not   tamper  or  try   to   influence  prosecution witnesses while on bail.

(iii) He will report before the IIC, Balianta Police Station, once every Monday between 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m., till completion of investigation.

(iv) He will remain present in the trial Court on each date it if fixed for trial unless his appearance is dispensed with by the learned trial Court under Section 317 Cr.P.C. on any particular day.

8.

Violation of any condition will entail in cancellation of bail/ recall of this order.

9.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

10.

Urgent  certified  copy   of  this  order  be  granted  on  proper application.

11.

Copy of this order be supplied to Mr.  S.S. Pradhan, learned Additional Government Advocate for onward transmission to the IIC, Balianta Police Station.

………………………………