High CourtsSingle Bench

Jameel Hussain and Others vs MACT, Sikar and Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 28 April 2006 · Citation: (2007) 5 RCR(Civil) 101 : (2007) 1 RLW 663 : (2006) WLC 636

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.S. Rathore, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 140
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 123 words

K.S. Rathore, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order dated 28.1.2005 by which the Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 50,000/- as interim award u/s 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act.

2.

The petitioners have challenged the impugned order to the extent of depositing the said amount in the fixed deposit for the period of five years.

3.

The interim award u/s 140 of the M.V. Act is passed to maintain the family even for no fault liability, therefore, in the interest of justice. I deem of proper to MACT. Sikar to disburse Rs. 50,000/- to the petitioner claimants immediately. The impugned order dated 28.1.2005 is modified to that extent only.

4.

The writ petition stands disposed of as indicated above.