High CourtsSingle Bench

Jamil Akhtar vs Himachal Gramin Bank And Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 1 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 SHI CK 0003

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1523 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 180 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

Notice. Ms. Devyani Sharma, learned Counsel and Mr. Dinesh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2, respectively.

2.

Without going into the merit of the issue involved in this petition, as it stands submitted on instructions by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner shall present himself before the learned Trial Court on 02.09.2020 and furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned Court below, this application is disposed of with the direction that till 03.09.2020, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with Criminal Complaint No. 271 of 2017, registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, pending adjudication before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., in which, he has been declared as proclaimed offender. The application stands disposed of accordingly.

3.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a hard copy of this petition with the Registry of this Court within a period of one week.

Copy dasti.