High CourtsSingle Bench

Janki Devi vs Uttarakhand Gramin Bank And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 April 2025 · Citation: (2025) 04 UK CK 0804

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 1024 Of 2025 (M/S)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 230 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers : -

“(I) Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 20.03.2025 passed by respondent no.2 (contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).

(II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to proceed pursuant to the impugned order dated 20.03.2025 passed by respondent no.2.

(III) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

(III) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

2.

Heard Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

3.

Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Advocate, has requested to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition granting liberty to her to file a fresh writ petition.

4.

The said request has not been opposed by Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

5.

The present Writ Petition (WPMS No. 1024 of 2025) is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition, but in accordance with law.