High CourtsSingle Bench

Jasbir Singh @ Momi vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0080

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 302 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 20033 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 667 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') in FIR

No.0039 dated 28.02.2019, for offence punishable under Sections 302, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'), 25/27/54/59 of the Arms

Act, registered at Police Station City Ferozepur, District Ferozepur.

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that as per the allegations in the FIR, registered at the instance of Kartar Singh, when he along with his son

Pritam Singh had gone to drop his kids to school on a motorcycle and the complainant and his other son namely Harbans Singh were present at Bassi

Gate Bazar after delivering the milk at Diary. Thereafter, Pritam Singh crossed them and they noticed that 02 boys on a motorcycle also crossed them

and the pillion rider of the motorcycle was having a pistol in his hand and are chasing him. In no time, the pillion rider fired a shot from his pistol.

Thereafter, the son of the complainant Pritam Singh fell from the motorcycle and they stopped their motorcycle and came near his son and again fired

4-5 shots and when Kartar Singh and his other son Harbans Singh ran towards Pritam Singh, the aforesaid boys along with the pistol ran away from

the spot. Thereafter, Pritam Singh died at the spot. It is further stated in the FIR that the motive of the occurrence is that one Harbhajan Singh @

Rana, whose family is indulging in the business of narcotics is having his house next to the house of the complainant and about 02 months' ago,

Harbhajan Singh had killed the brother of the complainant namely Bagga Singh with fire shot from the pistol and in self-defence, Bagga Singh also

opened fire and killed Harbhajan Singh @ Rana. Joginder Singh @ Sammi, his brother Soni and his father Lal Singh @ Lallu, who are lodged in a jail,

were extending threats to them and threatened to kill them. It is also argued that the petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2020 and it will take some time

in conclusion of the trial due to COVID-19 situation.

Counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that thereafter, during the investigation, the police recorded the statement of one Jagdish Singh, who

stated that when he was having a dinner at a Dhaba then Amarjit Singh @ Ambi, Kali @ Ramesh and 03 unidentified persons were making a plan to

commit the murder of Pritam Singh.

Reply by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, City Ferozepur is filed and as per the reply, Raj Singh @ Shindri @ Chindi, who

was arrested after recording the statement of the aforesaid Jagdish Singh has made a disclosure statement that they committed the offence and the

weapon used in the crime was handed over to the petitioner and thereafter, the petitioner was arrested and the weapon was recovered. It is further

submitted that there is no allegation of any conspiracy or motive against the petitioner and the only allegation is that the weapon was recovered from

him.

Counsel for the State, on the basis of the Custody Certificate, has also submitted that the petitioner is involved in one more FIR registered under

Section 25 of the Arms Act and under the Excise Act.

Without commenting anything on merits of the case and considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2020; the custodial

interrogation of the petitioner is not required and the conclusion of the trial will take some time due to COVID-19 situation, this petition is allowed and

the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty

Magistrate.

However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, in case he is found involved in any other case or misusing

the concession of bail, in any manner.