High CourtsSingle Bench

Jaskaran Singh Alias Pinta vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0151

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 148, 149, 188, 323, 324, 326, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 20465 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 383 words

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J

1.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.89 dated 16.4.2020 at Police

Station Kathunangal, District Amritsar under Sections 323, 324, 188, 148, 149, 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, wherein offence under Section 326

IPC was added lateron.

2.

At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 27.7.2020 the following order was passed:

“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per FIR, two grievous injuries were inflicted upon the complainant i.e. one with the help of

‘Kirpan’ by the petitioner on the face of the complainant and another grievous injury on the nose of the complainant which is attributed to the

coaccused Malkit Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that co-accused Malkit Singh has already been granted concession of

anticipatory bail vide order dated 8.7.2020 passed in CRM-M-13853-2020 and in these circumstances, the petitioner also deserves concession of

anticipatory bail on the ground of parity.

Notice of motion for 9.12.2020.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction

of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the

Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.â€​

3.

The learned State counsel, upon instructions from SI Harparkash Singh, has informed that pursuant to interim directions issued by this Court, the

petitioner has since joined investigation and that infact it is a case of cross-version where Malkit Singh had also sustained injuries.

4.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case especially that it is a case of cross-version, where it would be debatable as to which of

the party is the aggressor and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has since joined investigation, the petition is accepted and the interim

directions issued by this Court vide order dated 27.7.2020 are hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation

as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2)

Cr.P.C.