High CourtsSingle Bench

Jasmeet Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 186, 332, 353, 307, 506, 427
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 39967 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 382 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') in FIR

No.184 dated 29.10.2020, for offence punishable under Sections 186, 353, 307, 506, 427 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short

‘IPC’) (Section 332 IPC added later) registered at Police Station Mataur, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali.

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that as per the allegations in the FIR, registered by Constable Pritpal Singh, he along with the SHO of the Police

Station, was present near a wine shop on a patrol duty and it was noticed that some young men were consuming liquor by keeping the same on the

bonnet of the car and when they were stopped from doing so, they became aggressive and tore away the official uniform of the complainant and

removed his turban and also tried to run over him with his car but he escaped. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2020

and without prejudice to his right of defence, he is ready to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the complainant/victim by way of a demand draft towards the

medical expenses incurred by him. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not involved in any other case.

Counsel for the State has not disputed the factual position but opposed the prayer for bail.

Without commenting anything on merits of the case, considering the fact that the petitioner is not involved in any other case; the custodial interrogation

of the petitioner is not required and the conclusion of the trial will take some time due to COVID-19 situation, this petition is allowed and the petitioner

is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate and

on payment of Rs.50,000/- by way of a demand draft favouring the complainant/victim before the trial Court.

The payment of Rs.50,000/- shall be a pre-condition before accepting the bail/surety bonds.

However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, in case he is found involved in any other case or misusing

the concession of bail, in any manner.