High CourtsSingle Bench

Jasvir Kaur vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0269

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 23133 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 378 words

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.111 dated 16.07.2020, registered at Police Station Sadar Malout,

District Sri Muktsar Sahib, under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC.

This Court, on 18.08.2020, passed the following order:

“Case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

This is a petition for anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.111 dated 16.07.2020 under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC registered at Police

Station Sadar Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was working as Multipurpose Health Worker with the Punjab Health Department and is

married to Sukhpal Singh, who is the elder brother of the co-accused Mahant Satnam Singh. The alleged sale deed dated 31.07.2019 was executed by

the coaccused in the name of complainant. The petitioner has no role to play in the present controversy and has been falsely implicated in the present

case. He further states that now at this stage, the compromise has been effected and the complainant Mithu @ Mithu Ram has tendered an affidavit

dated 05.08.2020 (Annexure P-2) in this regard. He (complainant) has received an amount of Rs.3 lacs from Mahant Satnam Singh i.e. co-accused of

the petitioner.

Notice of motion for 15.12.2020.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. N.K. Banka, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.

Meanwhile, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and if she is sought to be arrested, she shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of

the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer subject to the conditions as envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.â€​

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 18.08.2020 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Baljeet Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is now not required for any

further investigation.

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 18.08.2020 granting interim bail

to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.