High CourtsSingle Bench

Jaswant Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 26 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 P&H CK 0346

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manjari Nehru Kaul, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 302
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 13336 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 335 words

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J

This is the third petition filed under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.43 dated 18.03.2020 registered under Sections 302 IPC, 1860 at Police Station Dhariwal District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1).

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case in hand for the murder of his father. It has been submitted that it was a case of circumstantial evidence and there was no qualitative evidence on record to link the petitioner with the alleged crime. Learned counsel has further submitted that the two material witnesses i.e. Jasbir Kaur, mother of the petitioner and Davinder Kaur, wife of the petitioner (witness of extra judicial confession) did not support the case of the prosecution and were declared hostile. He has further contended that the petitioner, who has been in custody since 20.03.2020, may be extended the concession of bail as there is no likelihood of the trial concluding in the near future.

Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. He has conceded that no doubt the two material witnesses i.e. mother and wife of the petitioner did not support the case of the prosecution and were declared hostile but the reason for them turning hostile was that the petitioner is none other than their son and husband respectively. He on instructions from ASI Satnam Singh has submitted that 5 out of 15 prosecution witnesses stand examined and the next date of hearing is 08.04.2021 when some more witnesses are likely to be examined and hence, the trial shall not take much time to conclude.

Heard.

Prima facie, there are serious allegations against the petitioner in the FIR in question for which he does not deserve the concession of bail. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed. However, the trial Court shall endeavour to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months.