High CourtsSingle Bench

Jatinder Kaur Sidhu And Another vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 2 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0051

HON’BLE JUDGES
H. S. Madaan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 406, 498A
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 36059 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 363 words

H. S. Madaan, J

Case taken up through video conferencing.

Petitioners â€" Jatinder Kaur Sidhu, aged 56 years and her husband Jodh Singh, aged 61 years, both residents of Opposite Court Complex, Gate No.2,

Barnala, accused in FIR No. 3 dated 6.6.2017, for offences under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station NRI District Sangrur, challan

against whom has since been filed in the Court, had approached the Illaqa Magistrate, by way of filing an application seeking permission to go to

Canada for a period of one year for the reason that their son is settled there and their visit to Canada is necessary to maintain the status of permanent

residents of Canada. Further it is contended that they have got sufficient moveable and immovable properties at village Kalake and Barnala. Their

such application was opposed by the State and complainant. Learned Magistrate, vide impugned order dated 27.10.2020 came to the conclusion that

since the matter has already been stayed by this Court, therefore, such Court has no power to pass appropriate order in the case. The application was

disposed of in that regard.

After going through the impugned order, I find that mainly because of the reason that petition for quashing of the FIR is pending in this Court, in which

notice with regard to stay of proceedings is said to have been issued, learned Magistrate, has not become functus officio and is not debarred from

entertaining and deciding the application. The order so passed is not sustainable and is accordingly, set aside, directing the Magistrate concerned to

decide the application on merits, in light of the fact that on earlier two occasions, petitioners had been granted permission to go abroad and they had

returned to India well within time.

The parties through counsel, are directed to appear before JMIC Barnala, on 8.12.2020.

Since pleadings are already there before the Court and only arguments are to be heard and this application is required to be disposed of, the whole

exercise be completed within a week of the parties putting in appearance before such Magistrate.

A copy of the order be sent to District and Sessions Judge, concerned, for compliance.

Disposed of.