Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Jayanmti De and Another vs Abani Kanta Barat and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 11 May 2000 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 3578(1) : (2000) 3 CTC 358 : (2000) 8 JT 264 : (2001) 1 MLJ 9 : (2001) 2 PLJR 153 : (2000) 91 RD 593

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. P. Sethi, J · K. T. Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 11, Order 41 Rule 11(4)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3379 of 2000 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 15446 of 1999)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 165 words

K.T. Thomas, J.—Leave granted.

2.

The appeal has been dismissed by the High Court with the following order:

This appeal is dismissed under Order XLI Rule 11 of the CPC.

There will be no order as to costs.

3.

We are not satisfied that the High Court has considered the appeal on merits. Even if the dismissal is under Order 41 Rule 11 and the High Court is not required under Sub-rule (4) to record in brief its grounds for doing so it is not a carte blanche to enable the appellate court to avoid recording any reason whatsoever. We think that the appeal required consideration on merits. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order and remit the appeal to the High Court for disposal of the same on merits and in accordance with law by stating the reasons. The position which remained as on the date of impugned order will continue till the disposal of the appeal.

4.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.