High CourtsSingle Bench

Jerald Nepolian vs State Of Kerala And Anr

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 30 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 KL CK 0215

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 8028 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 220 words
1.

This Bail Application filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code was heard through Video Conference.

2.

Petitioner is an accused in Crime No. 1265 of 2020 of Chalakkudy Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Section 354

A (1) (i) of IPC and the offence under 3 (1) (w) (i) of the provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989.

It is now a settled position that if an accused is able to show that prima facie the offence under the provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled

Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, is not attracted, he can file an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Moreover in Sharon A.S. and others Vs.

State of Kerala (2018 KHC 663), a Division Bench of this court observed that, if a bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C is dismissed by the

Special Court, an appeal is maintainable before this Court under Section 14A of the said Act.

In such circumstances, the petitioner can file an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C before the Special Court if he is advised so. Therefore, this Bail

Application is dismissed without going to the merit of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to file an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C before the

Special Court if he is advised so.