AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 259 wordsThe present application has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in connection with Mihijam P.S. Case No.136 of 2018, corresponding to
G.R. No.64 of 2020, registered under Sections 406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.12.2019. It has been further submitted that the
allegation against this applicant is that he has received an amount of Rs.12,50,000/- from the informant but he has supplied material of worth of
Rs.5,88,452/- only. It has been further submitted that due to market situation, he could not supply the rest of the material. Hence, he deserves to be
enlarged on bail.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that the applicant has criminal antecedent and as such he does not
deserve the privilege of bail.
Be as it may be, since the dispute between the parties is civil in nature and also considering the period of custody, the petitioner, named above, is
directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
of learned S.D.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Mihijam P.S. Case No.136 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No.64 of 2020 subject to the conditions
that the petitioner will submit self attested copy of his Aadhar Card and also give his mobile number before the learned court below which he will not
change during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
