High CourtsSingle Bench

JITENDRA @ TIKENDRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 9 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 CHH CK 0021

HON’BLE JUDGES
RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MCRC No. 72 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 353 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been

arrested in connection with Crime No.526/2017, registered at Police Stationâ€" Telibandha, Raipur, Districtâ€" North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) for the

offence punishable under Sections 20 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is in jail since 13.12.2017.

He is local resident of District-Raipur and is ready to abide by all the conditions and directions, which may be imposed while granting bail to him.

Presently the charge-sheet has been filed and the case is before the trial Court and the trial is likely to take some time before its conclusion. Hence, it

is prayed that applicant be enlarged on regular bail.

3.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submissions made in this respect.

4.

Heard both the parties and perused the case diary.

5.

On the date of incident on 13.12.2017 on a search made by the police personnel of PS-Telibandha, applicant was found in possession of 1.5 kg

ganja the narcotic substance, which was seized and case was registered against the applicant. Hence, this case.

6.

Considering on the nature of offence committed and as the case is presently before the trial Court. The trial against the applicant is likely to take

some time before its conclusion. Applicant is a local resident of District-Raipur and his availability before the trial Court shall not be compromised if he

is enlarged on regular bail, for this reason, I am of this view that this is a fit case where applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his

furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance

as and when directed.