High CourtsDivision Bench

Joginder & others vs State of H.P. & others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 1 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 SHI CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, Ajay Mohan Goel
CASE NUMBER
2862 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 175 words
1.

It is not in dispute that the award with respect to the land, in question, stands passed in favour of the writ petitioners. Allegedly, the amount, in

terms of the award, has yet not been released to the writ petitioners.

2.

Be that as it may, with the consent of the parties, we dispose of the present petitions with a direction to respondent-authorities to consider and

decide the petitioners'' request, which the petitioners shall be making within a period of two weeks from today. We are hopeful that upon receipt of

such representation(s), the respondent authorities shall take action, rather expeditiously and more so within a period of four weeks thereafter.

3.

Needless to add, all actions shall be taken strictly in accordance with law. Also, opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to all concerned.

Liberty reserved to the petitioners to approach the Court on same and subsequent cause of action, if so required and desired. Also, alternate

remedies, in accordance with law, can be exhausted. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.