AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 383 wordsBy filing the present petition under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought regular bail in FIR
No.20 dated 26.02.2015, registered under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the ‘Act’), at
Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur.
The interim bail is sought on the ground that the petitioner was hospitalized on 06.09.2018 on account of surgery and various other ailments and still he
is under observation of the doctors of the treating hospital, therefore, another three months time has been prayed for. He further states that the
petitioner did not misuse the concession of the interim bail.
On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the prayer made.
Heard.
This is the sixth bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner. Vide order dated 21.09.2017 passed in CRM-30020-2017 in CRM-M-38203-2016, the
petitioner was allowed interim bail on medical grounds which was extended for another period of three months by way of the present petition, vide
order dated 25.01.2018. Thereafter, the interim order dated 25.01.2018 was extended from time to time. Today, by virtue of CRM-33353-2018, the
petitioner is seeking extension of interim order dated 25.01.2018 for another three months. In pursuance of the last order, the petitioner has placed on
record the chart showing the period of hospitalization from the date when he was admitted to bail i.e. 25.01.2018. A perusal of the chart appended
with CRM-33353-2018 reveals that after 29.04.2018, the last date when the petitioner was admitted in Guru Nanak Dev, Hospital, Amritsar, the
petitioner has never been hospitalized and he is only taking treatment as an outdoor patient. It is only on 06.09.2018 the petitioner was again admitted.
There is nothing on record that the petitioner is still required further hospitalization. Moreover, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to
point out any fresh circumstance in favour of the petitioner.
Keeping in view the above, no case for extension of interim bail allowed vide order dated 25.01.2018 is made out. Accordingly, the present petition
and CRM-33353-2018 stand dismissed. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court within three days from today.
However, the State is directed to take the petitioner to hospital for treatment as and when advised by the doctor.
