AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
27 paragraphs · 508 wordsRaja Vijayaraghavan V, J
The above captioned application seeking anticipatory bail has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Code†for
short) by accused nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.605 of 2021 of the Kundara Police Station registered under Sections 447, 294 (b), 323, 324, 354 and 34 of
IPC.
The prosecution allegation is that on 16.04.2021 at about 1.00 p.m., the 1st accused drove a car into the courtyard of the house of the de facto
complainant and when the same was questioned, she and her family members were attacked.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent of all allegations. The learned counsel would refer to
Annexure-2 FIR in Crime No.321 of 2021 registered on 28.02.2021 at the instance of the 3rd petitioner herein against the de facto complainant in
Crime No.605 of 2021 and it is argued that the registration of the instant crime is as a counter blast to the registration of the earlier crime. It is further
submitted that no incident of the nature alleged had taken place on 16.01.2021. He would further contend that no serious injuries were sustained by the
victim.
The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer.
I have considered the submissions and have carefully evaluated the records. It appears that at the instance of the 3rd petitioner herein an earlier
crime was registered. It does not appear from the records that any serious injuries were sustained by the injured. The contention of the petitioners that
the aforesaid crime is merely a counter blast of the earlier crime cannot be brushed aside. The applicants are not reported to be persons with criminal
antecedents. Having considered the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary for an
effective investigation in the instant case.
In the result, this application will stand allowed. The applicants shall appear before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today and shall
undergo interrogation. Thereafter, if they are proposed to be arrested, they shall be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of
Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum. The above order shall be subject to the following conditions:
i) The applicants shall cooperate with the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m., for two months
or till final report is filed, whichever is earlier.
ii) They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from
disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
iii) They shall not commit any similar offence while on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and
pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
