High CourtsDivision Bench

Junab Ali vs Emperor

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 May 1904 · Citation: (1904) ILR (Cal) 783

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pratt, J · Handley, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) — Section 110
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 133 words

Pratt and Handley, JJ.—The petitioner was released from jail on the 26th September 1902, after having undergone one year''s imprisonment on failure to furnish security for his good behaviour u/s 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. About fifteen months afterwards fresh proceedings of the same nature were started against him and in the result he has been again ordered to furnish security to be of good behaviour for a period of one year.

2.

We think that the petitioner has not had a sufficient locus poenitentioe and that the evil reputation which he had before his imprisonment has still followed him and permeated the evidence of many of the witnesses. We therefore think that the order of the Magistrate dated the 29th February 1904, should be set aside and we order accordingly.