Justine Pallivathukkal vs State Of Kerala And Ors

,,,

Shaji P.Chaly, J",,,

This is a Public Interest Litigation filed by an Advocate who is also claiming to be a public spirited person acting for the common cause of the,,,

society, particularly related to minorities in the State of Kerala. Petitioner is a member of Roman Catholic community, which is one of the minority",,,

communities. The grievance highlighted by the petitioner is that while most of the socio, economic and educational empowerment schemes and",,,

programmes of the Central Government are meant for the socio economically poor and downtrodden sections of the society including the six centrally,,,

notified minorities, while implementing various schemes in the State of Kerala there is marked discrimination favouring one minority against other",,,

minority communities without any rationale.,,,

According to the petitioner, in order to translate the intention of the framers of the constitution and to safeguard the minority communities and to",,,

protect them from discrimination and deprivation of their rights, the Union Government had set up the National Commission for Minorities under the",,,

National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, hereinafter called, 'Act, 1992'. It is the case of the petitioner that, as per section 20 of the said Act,",,,

minority community for the purpose of the Act means, communities notified as such by the Central Government. Therefore, according to the",,,

petitioner, six religious communities viz., Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Zoroastrians (Parsis) and Jains have been notified in the gazette of",,,

India as minority communities by the Union Government.,,,

It is further submitted that the functions of the National Commission in contemplation of section 9 of Act, 1992 make it clear that it should govern",,,

the overall development of the minority communities without any undue favour to any particular community. Thereafter, on 9.3.2005, a notification",,,

was issued by the Central Government for the constitution of a High Level Committee to prepare a report on the social, economic and educational",,,

status of the Muslim community of India known as “the Prime Minister's High Level Committeeâ€​, chaired by Justice Rajindar Sachar.",,,

The Committee consisted of 7 members and it has submitted a report to the Prime Minister on 17.11.2006 with various recommendations and,,,

findings. The recommendations include; (1) set up an equal opportunity commission to look into the grievances of the deprived groups like minorities;,,,

(2) create a nomination procedure to increase participation of minorities in public bodies; (3) establish a determination procedure that does not reserve,,,

constituencies with high minority population for scheduled castes; (4) increase employment share of Muslims, particularly where there is great deal of",,,

public dealing. Work out mechanisms to link Madrasas with Higher Secondary School Board; and (5) recognise degrees from Madrasas for eligibility,,,

in defence, civil and banking examinations.",,,

Anyhow, in 2006, the Union Government under the Prime Minister's New 15 point programmes for the welfare of minorities announced scholarship",,,

schemes for minority students from minority communities. On the basis of the scheme formulated, the Union Government is providing scholarships to",,,

students belonging to minority communities to promote pre-matric and post-metric financial assistance. Scholarships are also given on merit cum,,,

means basis. According to the petitioner, nowhere it is stated that scholarships shall be provided to any particular minority community in preference to",,,

other minority communities.,,,

Therefore, the legal contention advanced by the petitioner is that the scheme formulated by the Union Government is in accordance with the",,,

constitutional principles as well as the provisions of Act, 1992 and the Kerala State Commission for Minorities Act, 2014. Exhibit P1 produced by the",,,

petitioner is a scheme published by the Union Government for the years 2017-2020 for pre-matric scholarship for students belonging to minority,,,

communities. It seems similar schemes are formulated in regard to post-matric students as well as on the basis of merit cum means. The sum and,,,

substance of the contention is that a perusal of Exhibit P1 would clearly show that the criteria is “minority status†as a whole and not individual,,,

religions forming part of minority communities.,,,

Anyhow the State Government has formed a 11 member committee for submitting proposals necessary for implementing the recommendations of,,,

Justice Rajindar Sachar Commission report in Kerala, headed by Paloly Muhammed Kutty, the then Minister for Local Self Government. The said",,,

committee also submitted a report on 21.2.2008 after considering various proposals and representations. As part of implementing the said report, the",,,

State Government established a minority cell and thereafter, various orders have been issued as part of implementing the report. One of the orders",,,

issued on 16.8.2008 by the State Government is Exhibit P2. As per Exhibit P2, it is clear that the Government approved the report of the Pololy",,,

Muhammed Kutty Committee and a Minority Cell was started in the Secretariat. Accordingly, 5000 scholarships have been set apart for degree and",,,

post graduate professional courses for Muslim women per year and 14 posts of clerks have been created in 14 districts. An amount of Rs.10 Crores,,,

was set apart for the implementation of the above scholarships. Thereafter, 1st respondent extended the benefit given in Exhibit P2 to Latin Catholics",,,

and other Converted Christians as per Exhibit P3 Government Order dated 22.2.2011 bearing G.O.(Rt.)No.57/2011/GAD. In Exhibit P3 it is only,,,

stated that the benefits given to the Muslim students in regard to the scholarships and hostel stipend shall also be given to Latin Catholic Christians and,,,

Converted Christian students.,,,

The predominant contention advanced by the petitioner in that regard is that, contrary to what is stated in Exhibit P3, without any rationale, the State",,,

Government issued Exhibit P4 order bearing G.O.(Rt.)No.3427/2015/GAD dated 8.5.2015 that reservation among the Muslims and other minority,,,

communities will be in the ratio of 80:20 i.e., 80% to Muslim Community and 20% to Latin Christians and Converted Christians. It is further stated that",,,

30% of the seats shall be reserved for girls. Therefore, it is contended that the fixation of ratio in Exhibit P4 is arbitrary, unjust and illegal and",,,

accordingly violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India. It is to be noted that the State Government passed the Kerala State,,,

Commission for Minorities Act, 2014 with an intention to constitute a State Commission for the comprehensive educational advancement, welfare,",,,

protection and empowerment of minorities in the State of Kerala and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, which Act has",,,

come into force w.e.f. 15.05.2013.,,,

Minorities is defined under section 2(d) of the Act to mean, “ a community notified by the Central Government under the Act, 1992â€. Section 9",,,

of the Act, 2014 deals with the functions of the Commission, the details of the same would be discussed hereafter. It is further contended by the",,,

petitioner that as per the 2011 census, in the State of Kerala 54.73% are Hindus, 26.56% are Muslims and 18.38% Christians and rest of the religious",,,

minorities are 0.33%. Thus, the total population of the minority communities in Kerala is 45.27% and out of which, 58.67% is Muslims and 40.6% is",,,

Christians and 0.73% constituted other minority communities. However, studies conducted by the Vital Statistics Division, Department of Economics",,,

and Statistics, Government of Kerala, regarding the percentage of birth analysis for the year 2017 shows that there are 14.96% Christians, 43%",,,

Muslims and 41.70% Hindus, and there is a drastic decrease of the Christian population. Consequent to the said development, complaints have been",,,

submitted before the Kerala State Commission for Minorities â€" the 2nd respondent and Exhibit P5 memorandum was submitted by the Catholics,,,

Bishops Conference of India Council for Laity regarding the sufferings of Christian Minority in India. Likewise, other memorandums were also",,,

submitted but according to the petitioner, the discrimination of granting largesse to one section of the minority community is still continuing without any",,,

legal backing and in total disregard to the available data on the subject. To highlight the same, petitioner has produced Exhibit P7 information dated",,,

14.10.2009 issued by the Public Information Officer under the State Government, wherein it is stated that the ratio of 80:20 is continued in the light of",,,

Exhibit P3 order dated 22.2.2011, and the case of the petitioner is that, the said ratio has no basis and formulated without conducting any study.",,,

S.No,Item,Hostell,Day Scholars

1.,"Admission fee from class VI

to X","Rs.500/- per annum subject to

actual","Rs.500/- per annum

subject to actual

S.No,Item,Hostell,Day Scholars

1,"Admission and tuition fee

from class XI to XII","Actual subject to a maximum ceiling of

Rs.7,000 per annum","Actual subject to

a maximum

ceiling of Rs.7,000

per annum

2,"Admission and course/tuition

fee for technical and

vocational courses of XI and

XII level (Inludes

fees/charges for raw

materials, etc.)","Actual subject to a maximum ceiling of

Rs.10,000 per annum","Actual subject to

a maximum

ceiling of

Rs.10,000 per

annum

3,"Admission and tuition fee for

under graduate, post graduate","Actual subject to a maximum ceiling of

Rs.3,000 per annum","Actual subject to

a maximum

ceiling of Rs.3,000

per annum

4,"Maintainance allowance for

10 months only in an

academic year (includes

expenses for study material,

etc.)",Rs.380 per month,Rs.230 per month

,"(i) Class XI and XII including

technical and vocational

courses of this level",,

,"(ii) Courses other than

technical and professional

courses at under-graudate",Rs.570 per month,Rs.300 per month

,"(iii) M.Phil and Ph.D (For

those researchers who are

not awarded any fellowship

by university or any other)",Rs.1200 per month,Rs.550 per month

Sri.P.Vijayakumar for the Union of India and O.A.Nuriya for the additional 4th respondent and perused the pleadings and materials on record.,,,

In the backdrop of the above contentions petitioner seeks to quash Exhibits P2 to P4 orders issued by the State Government dated 16.8.2008,",,,

22.2.2011 and 8.5.2015. In Exhibit P2, the General Administration Department (Minority Cell) states that on the basis of the study conducted by Paloly",,,

Muhammed Kutty Committee regarding the implementation of Justice Rajindar Sachar Commission report in Kerala, a minority cell formed and",,,

started functioning in the Secretariat. Paragraph 4 thereto states that 5000 scholarships of Rs.3,000/-, Rs.4,000/- and Rs.5,000/- each per year will be",,,

allotted to Muslim girl students, who are undergoing degree, Post-graduate professional courses on merit-cum-means basis, which would be executed",,,

by the Department of Collegiate Education, and paragraph 6 specifies that a clerk post each in 14 districts will be created under the Deputy Collector",,,

(General) for the purpose and an amount of Rs.10 Crores is set apart for Minority Welfare Programme as allotted in the supplementary request made,,,

in July 2008 budget.,,,

Exhibit P3 order specifies that on the basis of the report of the committee specified above, Government have considered the matter elaborately",,,

and have decided to give scholarships and hostel stipends to Latin Catholics and Converted Christians as given to Muslim girl students. It further,,,

denotes that criteria for getting scholarship and hostel stipends for Muslim girl students will be applicable to the above category as well. However, it is",,,

significant to note in the said order that the Latin Catholics and Converted Christian girl students are only permitted to get 20% of the total number of,,,

scholarships/hostel stipends, which are given to Muslim girl students and further that, the number of scholarships/hostel stipends, which are given to",,,

Muslim girl students will continue as Rs.5000/- and Rs.2000/- respectively. Exhibit P4 Government order is in regard to scholarship scheme for,,,

minority students pursuing courses such as Chartered Accountancy (C.A) and Works Accountancy (I.C.W.A) and Company Secretaryship, wherein",,,

after specifying the nature of the scheme it is categorically stated that the selection will be based on merit and income basis having 60% marks in,,,

B.Com/other graduation and students having annual income below Rs.6 lakhs are eligible for scholarship and preference will be given to BPL,,,

candidates. The crucial aspect therein is that the reservation among Muslims and other minority communities is in the ratio 80:20 and 30% of seats will,,,

be reserved for girl students. Thus, altogether an amount of Rs.1,80,00,000/- is provided towards scholarship 1) to the students undergoing coaching",,,

for intermediate 2) to the students undergoing coaching for final and 3) foundation course, at the rate of Rs.12,000/-, Rs.12,000/- and Rs.6,000/-",,,

distributed among 500, 500 and 1000 students respectively.",,,

It was in the said background that the Catholic Bishops Conference of India and the petitioner submitted Exhibits P5 and P8 representations,,,

respectively. These are the basic background facts available before us to decide the issues raised by the petitioner in regard to the distribution of the,,,

merit cum means scholarship to the students belonging to the minority communities. Basically the rights available to minority communities stems out,,,

from Article 29 of the Constitution of India dealing with protection of interest of minorities. Clause 1 thereto clearly specifies that any section of the,,,

citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the",,,

same and clause 2 thereunder specifies that no citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid,,,

out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them. Article 30 of the Constitution deals with the right of minorities to",,,

establish and administer educational institutions .,,,

A conjoint reading of Articles 29 and 30 makes it clear that while granting any aid by the State to educational institutions the State shall not,,,

discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority whether based on religion or language,",,,

which in fact clearly translates the true intention of the framers of the Constitution of India.,,,

Viewed in that background we are proceeding to understand the provisions of the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992. The statements",,,

of objects and reasons of Act, 1992 states that the Minorities Commission was set up in January, 1978 for providing an institutional arrangement for",,,

evaluating the safeguards provided in the constitution for the protection of the minorities and to make recommendations for ensuring implementation of,,,

the safeguards and the laws. It was also found that the Minorities Commission with statutory status would infuse confidence among the minorities,,,

about the working and the effectiveness of the Commission and it would also carry more weight with the State Governments/Union Territory,,,

Administrations and the Ministries/Departments and the other organisations of the Central Government. That is how the Commission was constituted,,,

consisting of a Chairperson and six members.,,,

The main task shouldered on the Commission shall be to evaluate the progress of the development of minorities, monitor the working of the",,,

safeguards provided in the constitution for the protection of the interests of minorities and in laws enacted by the Central Government besides looking,,,

into the specific complaints regarding deprivation of rights and safeguards of the minorities. It shall also cause studies, research and analysis to be",,,

undertaken on the issues relating to socio economic and educational development of the minorities and make recommendations for the effective,,,

implementation of the safeguards for the protection of interests of minorities by the Central Government or State Governments. Section 9 of the Act,",,,

1992 deals with the functions of the Commission, which reads thus:",,,

Functions of the Commission.-(1) The Commission shall perform all or any of the following functions, namely:-",,,

(a) evaluate the progress of the development of minorities under the Union and States;,,,

(b) monitor the working of the safeguards provided in the Constitution and in laws enacted by Parliament and the State Legislatures;,,,

(c) make recommendations for the effective implementation of safeguards for the protection of the interests of minorities by the Central Government,,,

or the State Governments;,,,

(d) look into specific complaints regarding deprivation of rights and safeguards of the minorities and take up such matters with the appropriate,,,

authorities;,,,

(e) cause studies to be undertaken into problems arising out of any discrimination against minorities and recommend measures for their removal;,,,

(f) conduct studies, research and analysis on the issues relating to socio-economic and educational development of minorities;",,,

(g) suggest appropriate measures in respect of any minority to be undertaken by the Central Government or the State Governments;,,,

(h) make periodical or special reports to the Central Government on any matter pertaining to minorities and in particular difficulties confronted by,,,

them; and,,,

(i) any other matter which may be referred to it by the Central Government.,,,

(2) The Central Government shall cause the recommendations referred to in clause (c) of sub-section (1) to be laid before each House of Parliament,,,

along with a memorandum explaining the action taken or proposed to be taken on the recommendations relating to the Union and the reasons for the,,,

non-acceptance, if any, of any of such recommendations.",,,

(3) Where any recommendation referred to in clause (c) of sub-section (1) or any part thereof with which any State Government is concerned, the",,,

Commission shall forward a copy of such recommendation or part to such State Government who shall cause it to be laid before the Legislature of the,,,

State along with a memorandum explaining the action taken or proposed to be taken on the recommendations relating to the State and the reasons for,,,

the non-acceptance, if any, of any of such recommendation or part.",,,

(4) The Commission shall, while performing any of the functions mentioned in sub-clauses (a), (b) and (d) of sub-section (1), have all the powers of a",,,

civil court trying a suit and in particular, in respect of the following matters, namely:-",,,

(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person from any part of India and examining him on oath;,,,

(b) requiring the discovery and production of any document;,,,

(c) receiving evidence on affidavits;,,,

(d) requisitioning any public record or copy thereof from any court or office;,,,

(e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses and documents; and,,,

(f) any other matter may be prescribed.â€​,,,

Section 10 makes it clear that the Central Government shall after due appropriation made by Parliament by law in that behalf pay to the,,,

Commission by way of grants such sums of money as the Central Government may think fit for being utilised for the purposes of the Act. It is,,,

significant to note that section 2(c) defines 'minority' for the purposes of the Act to mean a community notified as such by the Central Government. It,,,

is undisputed that the Central Government has notified six religious communities viz., Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Zoroastrians (Parsis) and",,,

Jains, in the gazette of India.",,,

Therefore, on a reading of section 9 and section 2(c) along with the notification so issued, it can be clearly seen that the functions of the",,,

Commission should govern the overall development of the minority communities as such without discriminating by and between the minority,,,

communities so identified. The Kerala State Commission for Minorities Act, 2014 was introduced with the intention to constitute a State Commission",,,

for the comprehensive educational advancement, welfare, protection and empowerment of minorities in the State of Kerala and to provide for matters",,,

connected therewith or incidental thereto, which has come into force on and w.e.f. 15.5.2013. Section 2(d) thereto defines 'minority' to mean, a",,,

community notified by the Central Government under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992. Section 9 of the Act deals comprehensively",,,

with the functions of the Commission which reads thus:,,,

9.Functions of the Commission.- The Commission shall perform the following functions, namely:-",,,

(a) to evaluate the progress of the development of minorities in the State;,,,

(b) to enquire and monitor the manner of functioning of various safeguards provided in the Constitution of India or under any other law or under any,,,

order of the Government, for the welfare, protection and empowerment of the minorities in Kerala;",,,

(c) to enquire into specific complaints about deprivation of social, economic,educational and linguistic rights, safeguards and benefits of the minorities,",,,

to bring such matters into the notice of authorities concerned, to suggest remedial measures and to monitor the follow-up actions thereon;",,,

(d) to participate in and give creative suggestions on, the planning programmes for the educational, social and economic development of the minorities:",,,

(e) to make recommendations as to the steps to be taken by the Government for the effective implementation of the measures and safeguards for the,,,

educational, social and economic development, welfare and protection of the minorities and to make report to the Government either annually or at",,,

such other time, as the Commission may deem fit and to monitor their timely implementation;",,,

(f) to cause studies to be undertaken into various problems arising out of discrimination towards minorities and recommend measures for their removal,,,

(g) to conduct studies, research and analysis and to organize seminars, symposium and awareness classes on the issues relating to social, economic",,,

and educational advancement of minorities;,,,

(h) to suggest appropriate measures to be adopted by the Government in respect of minority,",,,

(i) to submit report to the Government periodically or specially, on any matter pertaining to minorities, particularly in respect of difficulties being faced",,,

by them and their remedial measures;,,,

(j) to discharge such other functions in relation to the protection, welfare, development and advancement of the minorities, as may be prescribed:",,,

(k) to take necessary steps to ensure the representation of minorities proportionate to their population in various employment projects and social,,,

development projects;,,,

(l) to ensure the efficient functioning of the law and order system in communal conflict prone areas and to bring lapses to the notice of the,,,

Government;,,,

(m) any other matter pertaining to minorities, entrusted by the Government"".",,,

Therefore, the intention of constituting the National and State Commission is clear, to protect the interests of the minorities notified by the Union",,,

Government by taking into account various aspects including educational, social and economic development of the minorities as such and not any",,,

particular minority. Which thus means, the National Commission and the State Commission are not entitled to segregate such backwardness among",,,

the minorities so as to protect the interests of any particular minority. It is clear from 2011 census that total population of minority communities in,,,

Kerala is 45.27% out of which 58.67% is Muslims and 40.6% is Christians and the balance 0.73% constituted other minority communities.,,,

On an analysis of section 9 of Act, 1992 what we could gather is that the Commission itself was constituted to evaluate the progress of the",,,

development of minorities under the Union and States taking into account the constitutional safeguards and the laws enacted by Parliament and the,,,

State Legislatures and accordingly make recommendations for the effective implementation for the protection of the interests of minorities by the,,,

Union Government and the State Governments. Further, the said Commission has got a duty to look into any specific complaints regarding deprivation",,,

of rights and safeguards of the minorities and is also obliged under law to take up such matters with the appropriate authorities.,,,

Here is a case where the Christian Minority community had made representations before the State Government and State Minority Commission,,,

regarding the discrimination meted out to the said community in the matter of award of merit-cum-means scholarship, but no action was initiated.",,,

Likewise, section 13 of the State Commission for Minorities Act, 2014, encompasses a duty on the commission to look after the welfare of the",,,

minority communities within the State without any discrimination. However, the orders passed by the State Government viz., Exhibits P2, P3 and P4",,,

show that clear discrimination is shown by favouring a particular minority community by providing scholarships in the ratio of 80:20 i.e., 80% to",,,

Muslims and 20% to the Latin Catholic Christians and Converted Christians, which is not the letter and spirit of the provisions of the Act, 1992 and the",,,

Act, 2014, formation of which is mandated by virtue of the Constitutional guarantee extended to the minority communities. Moreover, the mandates",,,

contained under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India are clearly violated by the State Government in the matter of the award of,,,

scholarships. It is also equally important to note that the Act, 1992 and the Act, 2014 envisions the Commission to treat the minority communities as a",,,

whole, and if at all the development of weaker sections among each of the minority communities is required, the Commission is to take into account",,,

the requirements of such weaker sections in each of the communities and divide the merit-cum-means scholarship equally by and between the,,,

members of the minority communities. However, in utter violation of the constitutional mandates contained under Articles 14, 15, 29 and 30, the State",,,

Government has issued the impugned orders.,,,

Article 14 clearly mandates that the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the,,,

territory of India, whereas Article 15 (1) specifies that the State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only on religion, race, caste, sex,",,,

place of birth or any of them, but at the same time we are concious of the fact that the provisions of Article 15 would not stand in the way of the State",,,

from making any provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the,,,

Scheduled Tribes in so far as such special provisions relate to admission of such classes of citizens to educational institutions including private,,,

educational institutions by virtue of Clauses (4) and (5) thereto, irrespective of the provisions of Articles 29 and 30 of the Constitution dealing with",,,

minorities.,,,

It is also clear from clause (6) of Article 15 that nothing in the said Article or sub-clause (g) of clause 1 of Article 19 or clause (2) of Article 29,,,

would stand in the way of the State from making, a) any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens other",,,

than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and (5) ; and b) any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens,,,

other than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and 5 in so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including,,,

private educational institutions whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of Article",,,

30 etc.,,,

On a reading together of Articles 14 and 15, it is clear that the State is endowed with a duty coupled with an obligation to look after the welfare",,,

and well being of the socially, educationally and economically weaker sections of citizens irrespective of the special provisions dealing with minorities.",,,

Therefore there is nothing wrong in the State Government providing facilities to weaker sections of the community, but when it comes to dealing with",,,

the notified minorities, it has to treat them equally, and it is not vested with any powers to treat them unequally, which is quite discernible from the",,,

provisions of the Constitution and the laws discussed above.,,,

But here is a case where without taking into account the entitlement of the Christian Minority community within the State available from the,,,

population ratio, State is indulging in providing scholarship to the Muslim minority community at 80%, which according to us, is an unconstitutional act",,,

and unsupported by any law. Mere executive orders issued by the State Government cannot overreach the provisions of the Minority Commissions,,,

Acts, 1992 and 2014, and the imperatives contained under the provisions of the Constitution of India discussed above. Article 29 also casts a duty to",,,

protect the educational interests of the minority community in equal measure and not in a discriminatory manner.,,,

A five member Constitutional Bench of the Apex Court in Chinnaiah v. State of A.P. [(2005)1 SCC 394] had occasion to consider the issue with,,,

respect to sub-classification among the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and held that except for a limited power of making an exclusion or,,,

inclusion in the list by an act of Parliament, there is no provision either to sub-divide, sub-classify or sub-group the castes which are found in the",,,

presidential list of Scheduled Castes. In our considered view, the Union Government in contemplation of section 2(c) of the Act, 1992 has notified six",,,

communities as minority communities in India which includes Muslims and Christians and therefore, the principles contained in the judgment in",,,

Chinnaiah supra would squarely apply to the facts and circumstances to the case at hand.,,,

True, taking into account various constitutional provisions and the aspects thereto, the judgment in Chinnaiah supra is referred to a Larger Bench",,,

of Seven Judges or more in the order in State of Punjab and Others v. Davinder Singh and Others [(2020)8 SCC 1]. Anyhow, as of now, the",,,

proposition of law guiding the field is the judgment in Chinnaiah, the constitutional provisions, and the provisions of the Act, 1992 and Act, 2014. That",,,

apart in Davinder singh (supra), the Apex Court expressed its opinion that the State Government has an obligation to undertake the emancipation of",,,

the deprived section of the community and eradicate inequalities and for that purpose it can make sub-classification within reserved castes within the,,,

SC and ST and adopt distributive justice method to redistribute and reallocate resources and opportunities to fulfil the very purpose of the,,,

Constitutional mandate of equal justice to all.,,,

Therefore, even if the findings rendered in the reference order for revisiting the findings in Chinnaiah (supra) by a Larger Bench is taken into",,,

account, the sub- division envisaged can only be within minority communities and not by taking the weakness of a particular minority community alone.",,,

In our view, in order to protect the interest of the notified minority communities as such, adoption of such a course is the only alternative and not",,,

otherwise as is done by the State Government .,,,

Therefore, deducing the facts, circumstances and the laws, we are of the considered opinion that the action of the State Government in sub-",,,

classifying the minorities by providing merit-cum-means scholarship at 80% to Muslim community and 20% to the Latin Catholic Christians and,,,

Converted Christians cannot be legally sustained. In that view of the matter, we quash Exhibits P2, P3 and P4 orders of the State Government",,,

deliberated above in detail, and hereby direct the Kerala State Government to pass requisite and appropriate Government orders providing merit-cum-",,,

means scholarship to the members of the notified minority communities within the State equally and in accordance with the latest population census,,,

available with the State Minority Commission.,,,

Upshot of the above discussion is that the writ petition is allowed to the extent specified above.,,,