High CourtsSingle Bench

Jyoti Prakash vs State Of HP And Anr

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 4 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 SHI CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Execution Petition No. 219 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 308 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 1.1.2019, passed by the Erstwhile HP State Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 6900 of 2018, whereby the Tribunal below having taken note of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant that his case is squarely covered by the judgment dated 21.4.2010, passed by this Court in CWP(T) No. 5253 of 2008, titled Narain Singh v. State of HP and Ors, further modified by the Division Bench of this Court, vide judgment dated 1.9.2015 in LPA No. 146 of 2010, State of HP and Ors v. Narain Singh, directed the respondents to extend the benefit of aforesaid judgment to the applicant, if he is found to be similarly situate, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents towards implementation of the aforesaid judgment, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.

2.

Learned Additional Advocate General states that though he has every reason to presume that by now, order/judgment alleged to have been not implemented, must have been implemented in its totality, but if not, needful shall be positively done within a period of two weeks.

3.

Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by the learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action towards implementation and execution of the judgment is taken.