High CourtsSingle Bench

K. Ramaswamy vs Principal Subordinate Judge

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 August 1997 · Citation: (1997) 2 KLJ 284

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J
CASE NUMBER
O.P. No. 11955 of 1997 W

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 192 words

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.—The Petitioner has obtained an Award. He submits that in terms of Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the Petitioner had applied with a certified copy of Award, seeking execution thereof, before the Respondent. It is submitted by the Petitioner that, that execution petition was returned directing the Petitioner to file a decree.

2.

Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 provided for a decree to be drawn by the Court concerned. But Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides that the Award shall be considered as a decree and shall be enforced under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in the same manner as if it were a decree of the Court. In such case, the Respondent court cannot insist for a decree to receive the execution application to its file.

Under Section 36, the executing court is duty bound to accept the execution petition with a certified copy of the Award. If the Petitioner produces a certified copy of the Award along with execution petition that shall be received and disposed of in accordance with law.

Original Petition is disposed of.