High CourtsDivision Bench

K. Satya@ Sarat Reddy And Another vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 31 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 OHC CK 0150

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ · S. K. Sahoo, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No.417 Of 2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 418 words

I.A. No.387 of 2021

1.

This is application for bail filed by Appellant No.2, K. Sanjib Reddy, who has been convicted by the impugned judgment dated 8th July, 2014 of the

Second Additional Sessions Judge, Berhampur, Ganjam in Sessions Case No.04 of 2006/Sessions Case No.362 of 2005 of G.D.C. corresponding to

G.R. Case No.62 of 2005 of the file of J.M.F.C., Purushottampur arising out of Purushottampur P.S. Case No.62 of 2005 for the offence under

Sections 302/34 IPC.

2.

It must be mentioned here that of the two accused persons, who are convicted, the co-accused i.e. K. Satya @ Sarat Reddy has already been

released on bail by this Court by order dated 27th January, 2015.

3.

Learned counsel for Appellant No.2 points out that he has remained in custody since 27th June, 2005 and has never been released on bail even

once. In other words, he has been in custody for over 16 years.

4.

He further points out that in this Court’s order dated 27th January, 2015 it has been recorded that it is perhaps Appellant No.2 who gave the

fatal blow to the deceased. However, the trial Court in para 6 of the impugned judgment notes that Appellant No.2, according to P.W.4, the sole

eyewitness, had stabbed the deceased on his back. Further it is pointed out that the fatal injury is an injury caused to the abdomen.

5.

Without expressing any view on the above submissions, the Court notes that Appellant No.2, K. Sanjib Reddy, has made out a prima facie arguable

case on whether in fact the blow caused by him was the fatal blow. The Court further notes that there is no likelihood of the present appeal being

taken up for hearing in immediate future.

6.

Keeping in view all of the above factors, and in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Surinder Singh @ Shingara Singh v. State of

Punjab, (2005) 32 OCR (SC) 430 , this Court is of the considered view that Appellant No.2, K. Sanjib Reddy, should be released on bail.

7.

Accordingly, this Court directs that Appellant No.2 (K. Sanjib Reddy) be released on bail in connection with the aforementioned case during

pendency of the present criminal appeal subject to the conditions that will be incorporated by the trial Court in an order and to the satisfaction of the

trial Court.

8.

The I.A. is disposed of in the above terms.

9.

An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.