High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 04 KL CK 0025

K.ABDURAHIMAN vs TIRUR URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 25 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shaji P.Chaly
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
14649 of 2017 (E)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 214 words
1.

Petitioner availed a loan from the respondent Bank.

Even according to the petitioner, repayment was

irregular, consequent to which Bank has initiated

action, resorting to the provisions of the SARFAESI Act .

Anyhow, the proceedings have reached a stage where

petitioner is issued with a notice by the Advocate

Commissioner as per the orders of the Chief Judicial

Magistrate Court, Manjeri in C.M.P. No.3994/2015. It

is thus seeking appropriate directions, this writ petition

is filed.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and

learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.

3.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner reiterated

the contentions raised in the writ petition and sought

indulgence of this Court permitting the petitioner to

repay the outstanding amount in twelve equated

monthly instalments. Learned Standing Counsel for the

Bank submitted that an amount of Rs.2,08,330/- is

remaining outstanding against the petitioner and

opposed the twelve equated monthly instalments sought

for by the petitioner.

4.

Taking note of the respective submissions,

petitioner is permitted to pay the outstanding amount in

ten equated monthly instalments, starting from

05.05.2017 and on the corresponding date of the

succeeding months. Needless to say, if any of the

instalments is defaulted, Bank would be at liberty to

proceed to recover the amount in lump.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.